| [Link to photos here] I’m back from my trip to Yellowstone National Park. In the end,I drove just over 2000 miles to get there,poke around and drive back all in about five days. I had a great time. The goal was to go off and explore someplace that I’ve wanted to visit all on my own,going where I wanted to go,stopping where I wanted to or not stopping at all. I’d have happily gone with Christina,but she didn’t have time off available and she encouraged me,since I’ve been talking about doing this for a couple years,to go have fun. And I did. The first day was a simple road trip from Vancouver to Missoula,Montana. I stopped part way there to visit Steptoe Butte State Park,which is about an hour south of Spokane where I grew up. It’s a big,cylindrical butte that sticks up above the Palouse country. Basically the whole countryside got smoothed down around it during the glaciers coming and going (this would have been some time ago…) The view was impressive but it did suffer from being sort of in the middle of nowhere. No exactly a getaway location. But,I’m glad I finally got to see it as it was kind of impressive. I drove on to Missoula and arrived there to try and find a motel to stay for the night. Apparently,I had the misfortune to arrive on a Friday evening where Freshman orientation,a long range rifle competition,a rodeo and something else were all taking place. Rooms were not plentiful. But,I persevered and found someplace to crash till morning. The next day I drove on to Gardiner,Montana,which is to the north of Yellowstone National Park. Now,a few words about Yellowstone which I didn’t know. Yellowstone was originally created as a National Park by Ulysses S Grant in 1872. As big as it is (~3500 square miles),Lewis and Clark managed to miss it entirely. Native Americans had been there something like 11,000 years before we stumbled across it. When Teddy Roosevelt visited (he’s got a Lodge named after him in the northeast of the park with a stellar view of the valley and mountains to the east),he decided the park wasn’t big enough. Using the newly passed Antiquities Act of 1906,he made Yellowstone much larger. He also created Crater Lake in Oregon and was a major force for preservation of the national resources by created protected spaces and National Parks. Back to the trip. Day two had me going to Gardiner then in to the Park. The Park has a limited set of roads,primarily two lane highways. The major route forms a figure eight or two ovals on top of each other. One could navigate much of the park by entering at the north and driving a figure eight and return back to where you started. The average speed limit is posted at 45,but all the animals,hills,traffic,people and whatnot,often you’re moseying at much less than that. At first this irritated me because I was still in “get there!” mode instead of slowing down to enjoy the scenery. The first place I stopped was Mammoth Hot Springs in the northwest of the park. Mammoth has an interesting set of terraces and geology that was very interesting to poke around in. Before moving on,I should give a little context. I’d been to Yellowstone once before when I was about … eight,I guess. Maybe seven. Between second and third grade we drove through on the way back from West Virginia where we lived briefly back to Spokane. I really don’t recall much. The most vivid memory is actually the smell of sulphur. And I recall bears begging on the sides of the road. I’m not entirely sure that’s my memory or just one I saw on television,though. It’s been awhile. This would be my first time going as an adult. I stopped and wandered around Mammoth Hot Springs and took lots of pictures. Then got back in the car and started wandering south,stopping at every little off road pullout or spring along the way that caught my eye. By early evening,I was approaching Old Faithful but I had regained the “get there!” attitude from earlier and was more interested in making it to my camp so I blew by it. I stayed at Grant Village,which sits next to West Thumb on Yellowstone Lake. It was a nice campground but as I got my camp put together it was clear that mosquitoes were going to make the evenings unpleasant. I got attacked through two coatings of various bug repellents. Not fun. In the evening I went to the Yellowstone Ranger presentation at the campground auditorium,led by Ranger Chuck. Lots of park background,info on the animals,questions about bears. Good stuff. The most pertinent detail I took away was that hiking away from others on my own would be stupid. The recommended hiking in Yellowstone involves yelling “Hey,bear!” or the equivalent and being in a party of more than one. I don’t yell and I was alone,so it didn’t look good for my hiking options. On top of all of that,on the Thursday before I left I was diagnosed with bronchitis and sent off with antibiotics,steroids and an inhaler. I was wheezing. Turns out much of Yellowstone is at 6000-8000 feet. Hiking at that altitude with a wheeze is not fun! Yeah,that’s my excuse. That and the desire to not get eaten by bears. Which,btw,did happen just a few weeks prior. A guy got eaten by a bear. His wife was smart enough to play dead,but he was killed. They believe he ran from the bear,which is bad. They closed off a significant chunk of the park because the bear is still out there. All these stories served to limit my feelings of adventurousness. I went back and hunkered down in my tent and sleeping bag and slept really well. Till around 4am when two things became clear:First,it was cold! Apparently nighttime temperatures were around freezing (I’d read around 40 and wasn’t worried). Second,my feet were cold. My feet are never cold. I sleep hot. So,it was cold. Socks did the trick,but it was still a bit nippy. Probably should have brought some long johns just in case,but I was sure I’d be fine. The next morning I drove from about 7 o’clock on the lower oval up around the outside to the northeast corner of the upper oval,which is where Roosevelt Lodge sits. On the way out of the campground,I saw my first large wildlife as about a dozen elk were wandering down the road,fairly oblivious to all the gawkers in cars and the side of the road. Roosevelt Lodge was was where Teddy would bring his buddies when they wanted to get away. It has a stellar view of the valley and mountains climbing to the east. But,as a Lodge? Meh. Timberline is a much more impressive Lodge,if you ask me… On the way there,traffic slowed. There was a buffalo on the side of the road,just standing there munching grass. For all I knew,this might be the only buffalo I would see,so of course I was bound and determined to get a good picture of him. Which I did. About a mile further down the road,the river came close and I spotted a few more buffalo off in the trees near the river. I pulled over and got out and took some pictures. In one of them,a couple of buffalo were gently head butting each other and generally wrestling with their horns while another,bigger buffalo watched from the shade. They seemed like a couple younger buffalo. A bit further down the road I stopped at another place called the Mud Cauldron. Off to the east were more buffalo. In fact,as I got out to look at the river below,four buffalo were crossing the Yellowstone River. One of them was a young calf who was not making forward progress across the river. It looked like he was struggling. There were other onlookers and they were starting to get stressed for the calf. After a few minutes,the calf got the bright idea to head for the shore directly rather than the indirect path his elders took. He popped out of the river about a hundred yards back from the other three,bleated as if to say “Hey! Wait for me!” then hustled his butt to catch up and they wander off. Crisis averted. The Mud Cauldron was impressive on its own but made more so by the presence of another couple dozen buffalo just hanging out around the boardwalks and pools of steaming mud. A couple times a buffalo crossed the boardwalk,much to the consternation of the tourists (me included) who decided that if the buffalo wanted to be on the boardwalk,we probably wanted to be somewhere else. Ranger Chuck from the night before recommended 100 yards distance from elk and buffalo. These guys were about 10 yards away in many cases and not all that concerned about all the attention. At one point,a small calf was hanging out on the boardwalk with someone who could have been his mom hanging out very nearby. That calf caused several groups to hear around that area rather than risk getting anywhere near a mom and baby buffalo! If you don’t know,the Yellowstone Caldera surrounds a good portion of the middle of the Park. It was termed a supervolcano because of the size of the eruptions which were something like 1000x the size of the 1980 Mount St. Helens eruption which I recall very well. The point of this is to say that much of Yellowstone is on or affected by a freaking live volcano! And you really can see that when you stop in random parts of the park and look around and see dozens of plumes of steam/smoke that are coming out of the ground in various places. You can’t swing a cat without hitting a geyser,super-heated pool,colorful mineral deposits in ponds and/or bubbling pools and ponds of water that’s either amazingly clear,highly acidic or bubbling mud! The first one I saw I thought it was an amazing thing. By the end of the day it was more like “Oh,look,more evidence that I’m going to stay a couple of nights here,on top of a freaking volcano”. Over the last decade,measurements indicate that underground domes are rising at the rate of a couple inches per year. Eventually these will blow up. Back in 2004,five dead bison were discovered to have died from inhalation of toxic geothermal gasses in the Norris Geyser Basin. Where I hung out. On the freaking volcano! Anyway. Back on the road after hanging out with the buffalo and the freaking volcano! The next major stop was Canyon Village,which is located near the Grand Canyon of Yellowstone. Which is a thing I didn’t know about before. That would be the result of a lack of interest in geography coupled with a public school education,I suspect. The canyon is amazing and gorgeous. Lots of stops for pictures and wandering down to the falls at the north end and various other stops along the way. There used to be an observation platform about midway down the Canyon that stuck out in to the Canyon about 100’ more than the current observation point. That is,until there was an earthquake back in 1975 that tumbled it in to the Canyon below. The current viewpoint has the end surrounded by cyclone fence but you can see where it used to be. It was here that I observed to myself that you can’t seem to turn around with a camera without being faced with yet another amazing photographic opportunity. Everything was just amazing view and vista followed by more and different vistas and views. After completing my wander up the Grand Canyon of Yellowstone,I continued up to the Roosevelt Lodge and wandered around there,frankly a bit underwhelmed aside from the stellar view. Then,it was back in the car. I wandered back down the right side of the topmost oval and across the middle. Apparently there was a really impressive forest fire back in 1988 which burned nearly a third of the park. You can still see lots of evidence of that,though it’s interesting to see loads and loads of 20 year old small trees which have self-seeded to fill back in the areas burned by the fire. To this day there’s a good percentage of tree trunks towering over the 20 year old baby trees,making for an odd but pretty striking view. Ranger Chuck was asked whether they inoculate the buffalo for disease and he said that no,their job was to preserve,not mess with the park and its animals. That means they don’t (I’m pretty sure) fight forest fires,which are a natural thing,of course,or mess with the animals. The exception to this is that when bears start messing with folks,they take a very quick and active hand in dealing with them. Often this means killing them. So,they are really serious that they don’t want people and bears mixing because when they do and the bears show signs of getting acclimated to people,they kill the bear. I again wandered down the left side of the lower oval,stopping at places that I’d driven by the day before. Back when it was discovered in 1870 (discovered by non Native Americans,I should say),it would shoot up in the air 120+ feet. From Wikipedia:“Eruptions can shoot 3,700 to 8,400 US gallons (14,000 to 32,000 l) of boiling water to a height of 106 to 185 feet (32 to 56 m) lasting from 1.5 to 5 minutes. The average height of an eruption is 145 feet (44 m). The highest recorded eruption was 185 feet (56 m) high. Intervals between eruptions can range from 45 to 125 minutes,averaging 66.5 minutes in 1939,slowly increasing to an average of 90 minutes apart today.” For years it would go off pretty reliably about every 60 minutes. The duration between eruptions has lengthened to around 90 minutes,but interestingly,they are more predictable. Old Faithful is also not the tallest or largest geyser in the park. That’d be Steamboat Geyser. I stopped there and while I was there that particular geyser only chugged up 10’ or so in the air,but it was pretty constant. Anyway,I got there about 45 minutes before the best guess at the next eruption,which would take place within minutes of sundown,if it was on time. They’ve built a series of benches two deep in a semi-circle around Old Faithful. When I got there there were only a few folks. As the predicted time approached,the benches filled up. I had a couple pre-teens around me who were clearly bored and not impressed by the whole thing. As the time to eruption approached,the geyser started belching some smoke. The boys were not impressed. Then,about the time it was predicted to start,Old Faithful started belching some water. But,only about 10-15 feet to start with. Again,the pre-teens were not impressed,going so far as to theorize (I’m sure not for the first time),that Old Faithful was really fed by a large hose from the Lodge just to keep people coming and that obviously the hose had broken for this eruption. Then,it went off,starting to belch water and smoke in to the air. I’ve no idea how high,but it certainly seemed like 60’-100’ in the air with the water and the steam. Now the boys were silent,letting out an occasional “Whoa!” I wandered back to my campground as the sun set,just enjoying the act of moseying through the park and watching the landscape go by. The next morning was cloudy and,in fact,I got rained on in the early morning. This was not auspicious. After I was up and about (warmer than the night before),I saw it was looking like a pretty cloudy day. I broke camp and packed up my stuff as the plan had been to move on to a different campground. But,the change in weather didn’t feel good. Plus,I really had seen much or most of the park. On a whim (which is kind of the point of this sort of road trip),I decided that I would go explore Grand Teton National Park,which is only 25 miles to the south of the south entrance to Yellowstone,which was very near my campground. I had a beautiful drive through the park,seeing yet more amazing scenery,though it was interrupted by occasional thunderstorms and lightning and rain. Reaching the south end of Grand Teton National Park,I paused and though about what I wanted to do. I could camp,but it was wet and that didn’t sound like fun. I could find a motel (the south end of Grand Teton National Park dumps out in Jackson,Wy,where the rich go to ski in the winter). In the end,I decided that I had seen as much as I wanted to see in those two parks and I made the decision to start heading back. My trip to Yellowstone and Grand Tetons was amazing. It’s hard to imagine that I grew up in the Western United States and really had no experience to speak of with the Parks. Did you know there is a Grand Canyon of Yellowstone? I did not know that. Have you ever heard buffalo talking to each other or the sound of a calf calling out to the other buffalo to wait up! Now I have. Did you know that the Sulphur Cauldron has the pH just one above battery acid? Which sounds terrible until you see it’s one below lemon juice,which doesn’t seem that bad. I was also reminded that as much as I enjoy some time to myself where I don’t have to meet anyone else’s needs but my own,after just a few days,I miss my wife,Christina,who was incredibly supportive of me just heading out and going exploring. She rocks! It was a great trip. I’m glad I made the opportunity and did it. I highly recommend it to anyone. [Link to photos here] Today is day one of my 2011 Road Trip Adventure to Yellowstone! The last time I was in Yellowstone was when I was 12 and we drove through it on the way back from West Virginia where we lived for a year back to Spokane. I really don’t recall much about the trip with the exception of bears sitting on the side of the road hoping to be thrown food and the smell of the sulphur pots. This year I’ll be exploring it on my own,camping in a few campgrounds in the park. But,it’s something like 14 hours from Vancouver to Yellowstone,so I broke the travel there up over two days. Today was from Vancouver to Missoula by way of Steptoe Butte State Park in Washington (map below). 
Steptoe Butte is what remains of a large outcropping in the middle of the Palouse after the glaciers came through and smoothed everything down. And,in their wake,left lots and lots of rich soil which became the Palouse. It’s off the beaten path,north of Colfax,Washington and I grew up just an hour north of it,but I’d never been to it. I only went this time on a recommendation of a friend (thanks,Gordon!) who said it’s worth checking out. And it is! The view down from it is a 360 degree view of the surrounding countryside. It’s very impressive. Visibility on this particular day wasn’t great,but it was pretty good. Here are a couple of pictures. First to the east and the next to the north. 

From there,I drove up to Spokane then out I-90 to Missoula where I’m now holed up in motel. I had to try four different motels because Missoula has stuff going on! Freshman orientation,a long range rifle competition,a rodeo and a couple other things. Motel rooms are in short supply! Tomorrow will be about 4.5 hours in to Yellowstone plus whatever it takes me to get to my campground. Probably another hour. It should be a great day! I don’t expect to have wireless to post much of anything from here on out,but I hope to post more when I get back! Christy Tyson was not the first librarian to make a significant impact on my life,but she certainly made the largest. By the time I was 10,I was running out of options in the children’s section I had been haunting in our local library. I’d been beside Encyclopedia Brown for every mystery,I’d accompanied the Hardy Boys everywhere they’d gone,I had met Mrs Which,What and Who while traveling with Meg and Charles Wallace. I’d accompanied Lucy to Narnia,been to the Mushroom Planet with Mr. Bass,adventured with Tom Swift,solved mysteries with the Three Detectives and saved Barsoom with John Carter. I’d loved all of them,but the stories that seemed to really get my imagination going were the Heinlein juveniles. These were like something entirely different and amazing to me. But,sadly,they were over too soon and there were,simply put,not enough of them. I’d come back in and check the racks to see if I had missed a Heinlein. Nope,nothing new. I needed more! One day,while rummaging through the kids section one more time for something new and interesting,I recall the librarian tell me that,you know,Heinlein had written other books. For adults. Really?. Where could I get such things. I craved them. I needed them. The librarian told me that I really wasn’t supposed to be looking for books in the adult section because apparently there was a policy about not letting unaccompanied kids check out books from the adult section. But,as I was clearly in need,she eventually relented and introduced me to the rest of the library. Where the adults found books… No crack dealer had ever more firmly hooked a new client than when that librarian introduced me to the mysteries and the power of the untapped shelves that were the Fiction section in my local library. Christy Tyson was no crack dealer,but she offered a different kind of drug. She offered a chance to hang out with other like-minded readers and do something that all young adults craved:Read books and share what we loved. When I was 16,Christy created the Young Adult Advisory Committee (or YAAC). This was a weekly meeting at the downtown Spokane Public Library at 9am on Saturdays. As you can imagine,9am on a Saturday was probably not the most attractive time in the world for a group of teenagers to get together and speak coherently about anything,but we did and and we were. I was there with my friends Ken and Bill and we were amongst the oldest of this crowd. Yes,it was a bookish crowd,but it was a group of young adults who got together with the intent of sharing what they thought about books. And here was the kicker that was hard for me to believe:Christy,who headed the Young Adult Services for the Spokane Public Library,would buy more of the books we liked and less of the ones we didn’t. Suddenly,our opinions mattered. That was a new and wonderful thing for me at that age. At a time when it seemed no one cared what a 16 year old thought about much of anything and I wasn’t convinced I had any opinions worth sharing,Christy was soliciting our opinions and making decisions based on those opinions. What a crazy,wonderful idea. We did a variety of things in YAAC. We read and reviewed books. We printed a monthly newsletter with reviews and articles. These were printed and available in the Young Adult (YA) sections of multiple libraries in the area. We had editors,we talked about what content we’d print,we wrote,we argued books and we shared what we loved and didn’t love about them. Christy encouraged critical thinking. Why did we like it. What worked or didn’t work about the book? We also created our Golden Pen award. Each year we’d nominate authors in different categories that had written books we loved. In 1982,our choice for Best Fantasy author was Piers Anthony,author of the Xanth fantasy books. We sent each of our recipients a nice letter and a real golden quill pen and plaque as part of the award. Mr. Anthony was kind enough to write back,thanking us for the award. Later,I recall my excitement when looking at the author notes in his Xanth paperback books,our Golden Pen award showed up in his bio. Someone was listening to us. What a great feeling for a bunch of young adults. We got involved in anti-censorship campaigns,including creating and selling anti-censorship buttons in school. I was able to participate in a radio story about Dungeons and Dragons including answering some questions about the game and played a mock game for the story. We also socialized together,had summer picnics and enjoyed each others company. I know of at least one case of a couple meeting because of YAAC and eventually marrying and having kids. As high school wrapped up,we “graduated” from YAAC as we prepared to head off to college. It was time to move on and Christy was there to wish us well and told us to be sure to stay in touch. That was … 27 years ago. I wish I could say I had done a good job staying in touch. But,I can’t. I lost touch with most of the friends I made during that time. Occasionally I’d hear something about one or the other of them. I heard when Christy moved to Seattle to join their library. I heard when one of our members published the compendium of Star Trek fiction. But,mostly,time passed as we all lived our lives. Christy passed away just after the first of this year in 2011. I heard about it via one of those friends I hadn’t kept in touch with but who knew that it would matter to know. Her family had a memorial service for her up in Seattle. I wanted to go and be there. Somewhere in my head I had the idea that I wanted to say something. To say thanks. Maybe to see some of those friends that were so important to me at a time when I really needed them. The memorial was attended by many of her friends and family. Amongst those friends were six of what her sister Jean called “Christy’s YAAC kids”. Speaking as one of those kids,at 45 years old,that was a nice feeling. Her sister said she spoke often of us and it’s nice to think that perhaps that time was in some way as important to her as it was to me. As I was catching up with some of those friends I hadn’t seen in so long,I was struck by an observation:Out of the six of us that were able to be there (there were many,I know,who would have liked to be there),we had in attendance three librarians. A full half of us had become librarians. What a wonderful thing to pass on to the world. Additionally there was a scientist,engineers,wives,husbands and partners. Christy had played a part in helping us,as well as many others like us,grow up and discover who we would be,who we could be. Good people who cared about the world,cared about reading,cared about each other. I did speak at the memorial. In amongst my fumbling to try and tell a story about Christy and talk about how she impacted my life,I tried to describe how if our lives were represented by stones tossed in a pond,some people live lives that,like a pebble in that pond,wouldn’t make many ripples. Their impact would be small and quickly lost. Other people live lives that make a splash,make ripples and waves that reach out and touch all the other ripples and waves from all the other lives that are represented by that pond. Christy truly was a boulder dropped in a pond. She impacted all of us who knew her in YAAC. Those ripples continue today as we share what we learned,that love of reading,that love for talking about books and sharing opinions and caring. The ripples from Christy’s life did not stop affecting me 27 years ago when I went off to college. The ripples from Christy’s life brought me back to her memorial where I got to meet her family and hear stories of her life from her co-workers and friends. Those ripples brought me back together once again with friends I hadn’t seen in more than a quarter century. That’s a life well and truly lived. Christy didn’t have kids of her own,but I will always be happy to be thought of as one of “Christy’s YAAC kids”. That’s an honor to me and with that,I hope I honor the difference Christy made not only in my life,but the lives of my fellow YAAC members and all the friends,family,co-workers and readers who she came in to contact with in her life. Thank you Christy. Thanks for everything. According to Wired,the Web is dead. This has the Internets all abuzz. Someone noted that Wired was trolling the entire Internet,meaning it’s saying something sensational simply to get a reaction. As with many thing,there’s probably truth in both camps. Wired wants traffic (both to their magazine and to their website –which lives on the Web –Irony Alert!). Having said that,there is something to what Wired is saying. Now,no one is saying that the Internet is dying. If you look at this article in response to the Wired article here,you’ll see that actual,total traffic heads up and to the right at a significant clip. The author does note in an update that just because traffic (think amount of data sent over the Internet) has increased,this does not correspond,necessarily with more people using the Internet more. And,that’s true,too. The reason I’m mentioning any of this is because it reminded me of a similar observation I made (to myself) probably a couple years ago. And this is:The Web is dying. Now,I’m not claiming to scoop Wired nor am I claiming prescience. All I’m saying is that this has been coming for some time,where by “this”I mean that the Web is changing fundamentally from one thing in to another thing. Call it caterpiller to butterfly. Call it child to adult. Some transmogrification is taking place. Here’s what I mean. Back a decade ago or so it was all the rage (at least amongst a set of techie folk) to go grab a domain and throw up a website. Some were personal,some were technical,some were combinations of both. On one of these sites you might find an album of pictures from various trips,you might find a link called “About Me”,you might find a resume or some postings of thoughts on various subjects. These sites were also playgrounds for folks trying out new web-centric technologies like PHP,HTML,CSS,etc. But,at their root,they were about folks staking out a chunk of the digital frontier and saying “This is me! This is mine! Here I am!” I did this,too. It’s right here at http://www.mossor.org. According to the Internet Wayback Machine,I’ve had my web site up since February of 2001. Yup,coming up here in less than six months,my site will have been alive for 10 years. And with that,I’m seriously thinking about either shutting it down or reducing it to some minimal presence. The driver for that is social networking. Facebook has,in my opinion,contributed in large part to the death of small web sites. And it did it by providing a simpler solution for what folks wanted to do in the first place. Turns out what people wanted was not a place to practice HTML,CSS,PHP and other web arcana. They simply wanted a way to easily share observations,thoughts or links and easy ways to share photos or other information. And the killer feature is that instead of sharing it with the entire world,as most web sites do,you’re only sharing it with those folks that you’ve decided should see it. (There’s an entire separate discussion about the godawful controls that Facebook has for controlling privacy and controlling access,but that’s too off topic for now) Back in the day (said the old fogey),I would put up albums of pics,maybe from a trip,and it would include pictures of me and my family,including my kids when they were little. It didn’t really occur to me that I was sharing this with both folks I’d want to see them as well as people I’d probably prefer not look at them. At the time,there wasn’t a great way to control access easily. There was some “security through obscurity”and other solutions with scripting and passwords,but it was kind of ugly. So,time passed. My interests changed,I wasn’t doing some of the computer animation work that I’d enjoyed for a while,my kids were growing up and I was getting uncomfortable with sharing pics of them without their permission or talking about them in what was essentially a public forum. Blogging started to take off but I really didn’t have a point of view that I really,really wanted to share on a regular basis. But,blogging also suffered from the fact that it was designed for an individual to publish content to the entire world (or at least the folks that knew about a given blog). It wasn’t a good solution if you wanted to share with a smaller audience that you wanted some control over. And then Facebook came along. Facebook allows us to create an album of photos and share it only with the folks that we want to. I can post observations or impressions or things I’m up to and know that it’s only seen by the intended audience. It’s also allowed reconnecting with some people I haven’t heard from in a number of years,which has been nice. (On the other hand,I think it also opens us to sharing a false sense of security that we’re just sharing with “Friends”when in reality there are folks that we have “Friended”who are in a different tier of “friendship”. There already stories of folks getting robbed while away from home when they posted on FB that they were going to be away for an evening –letting more people than they really thought about know that their houses were unattended.) Let’s come back to where we started:The Web is Dead. Hyperbole? Sure,some. But also some truth. The Web as it existed a decade ago,serving the audience that it did,is dying. It’s being replaced by a different set of tools,consumed by a different audience,generated by a different set of creators who are interested in getting their content out there more than coding in arcane web tools. It’s a natural progression,I suppose. The pioneers make way for the city folk. Rutted wagonways make way for the roads to speed traffic. Buggies give way to the horseless carriages which give way to automobiles and sport cars. Route 66 is replaced with highways. That is the nature of progress,after all. And,as much as I love technology,I’m not interested in keeping up http://www.mossor.org to have it become some stop on what used to be the Web back in the mid-2000s,like folks used to stop at the site of the Largest Ball of String or the World’s Tallest Thermometer. Perhaps the site will morph in to something else. You never know. I still love technology and still love the control that comes with owning my own little corner of the Internet. But,times change. And you either change with it or get left behind!  That Was The Year That Was (Tom Lehrer) So,it’s a bit early to call this year complete,but for my purposes,the year I’m going to review is from mid-November to mid-November (more or less). For these purposes,we’ll call that 2009. The year that was 2009 got an early start in mid-November of 2008. The startup that I’d been a part of for a little more than a year ran out of funding and was forced to close its doors. It was very sad since we had interesting products (which were arguably still looking for their best markets),great tools,great folks and actual customers. Unfortunately,a hardware company is a tougher sell to investors even in good times. In the bad times of late 2008,at the beginning of the year-long recession we’re arguably still in the midst of,it was an untenable time to try and wrangle tens of millions of dollars from financiers who were trying to hold on to what they had in hopes of weathering the coming storms. We were forced to close our doors on November 14th,2008. For all but the CEO,who probably had a bit more warning than the rest of us,we came in that Friday hoping that we had another couple weeks to secure financing which seemed like it might happen and left at the end of the day with a box with our personal stuff in it while they locked the building behind us. Around the same time,you might recall,we elected our first African American President in our country’s history. This was,for me,probably one of the most hopeful things to have happened in a great while. After Ambric closed its doors,we took a vacation that we had planned (and paid for) for some time before that. It was a nice vacation. I even did a phone screen for a job,so things seemed like they might not be so bad. I was wrong. The phone screen turned in to an interview at the company down in Mountain View. It went poorly. It seemed more an opportunity to torture the candidate than to really establish whether I was a good candidate. What it did do was establish that this was not a place I wanted to work. Which was fortuitous since it turned out they felt the same way. For much of the next few months,I sent out lots and lots of resumes,usually getting no response whatsoever indicating that they were even received,let alone seen by human eyes. It was a cold,cold winter on the job front. In the Spring,based on my experience with Ambric,I landed a consulting job for the company that purchased the IP (Intellectual Property) that remained after Ambric shut its doors. I was tasked with rebuilding the process that we used to build and test the tools. This meant provisioning a Linux and Windows box,running down the necessary tools,installing and configuring them and trying to recreate the build process which hadn’t run in the past five months. I described the process like this:Imagine that you know what the Death Star from Star Wars looks like. Now imagine someone hands you a tote full of Lego bricks and says “This can,if assembled correctly,be built in to the Death Star. We don’t have the instructions. But,we know you know what the Death Star looks like,so please build us a Death Star.” It was a great project and I delivered a working solution that could build the product and run some basic tests. (And,yes,like the Lego project above,there may have been some bricks left over…) This kept me busy and off the unemployment rolls for two and a half months. I am very thankful for that opportunity. That project ramped down and it was back to looking for jobs as my full time occupation. Much like the winter was cold,the late Spring was very,very dry on the job front. In June I landed a job. It was the one job in my professional life that I look back and and think was a terrible mistake and wish I’d not taken it. But,things were learned in my two and a half months there and then I was out in the market again. And that was two and a half months of making a salary (albeit reduced) and not being on unemployment. This year seemed to have a theme to it. Loss. For most of the year I had known that my mother was suffering from COPD. Amongst the list of things I’m thankful for (which probably ought to be a separate exercise,whether I choose to share it or not) is that I was able to travel the seven hours by car to spend several weeks with my parents and specifically with my mother. On Mother’s Day my brother and I were there and I wasn’t sure she was going to make it through the weekend. I’m glad I was there,but it was a very hard time to be there. My sister flew out from the east coast and stayed with my parents for a couple weeks. I joined her for roughly a week of that. I’m thankful for that time with her,as I don’t get to see her as much as I’d like. I’m also thankful for the additional time with my mother. My mother passed away the first of August,2009. She was at home with my father,which is where she wanted to be. I was struck,repeatedly (as with a hammer to the forehead) by the disconnect between how I experienced this intellectually and how I experienced this emotionally. I could intellectualize myself through the process all day,but all it took was thinking a bit about how it felt and it was like getting beat with an emotional hockey stick. Surprisingly painful and difficult. So,loss of a close family members,loss of job(s). Loss of control. This was a big one for me. I pride myself (and pride goeth before the yadda,yadda,yadda) on many things in my life and one of those is my career. I’ve been very fortunate,in many respects,but it’s also come with a great deal of work on my part. That is to say,I’ve worked hard for my career. To have that sense of control of my destiny yanked away by the realization that circumstances outside my control can still have a dramatic effect on me and on my career was a painful realization. Learning to focus on the things that I can control and attempting to let go of the things I cannot. Now there’s something I could likely spend the rest of my life working towards and never reach that goal. In the first week of September,I received an email from a former co-worker asking if I knew someone looking for a job as a QA (Quality Assurance) Manager. While I am not a QA Manager,I threw my hat in to the ring in part because,frankly,there weren’t that many rings in which to toss my hat. After a few weeks a time was set up to interview. In that same timeframe I found out I would be interviewing against another former co-worker from Ambric who actually is a QA Manager. And a good one. Crap. But,I had some indications that perhaps they might consider a Development Manager who could do some QA. I thought I could do that. So,I retained some hope. In the end,the QA Manager rocked her interview and apparently I did well with mine because we were both offered jobs. The best of all possible outcomes. So,on November 3rd,2009,I started my new job as a Development Engineer at Flashlight Engineering and Consulting. It’s been a little over a month now and it has been more than 13 years since I have had this much fun at a job. And a job that felt like a good fit for me and where I want to be in my career. To summarize,this last year,as I choose to measure it from mid-November 2008 to mid-November 2009 has been a year of ups and downs. It’s a year I would not choose to repeat,though I suppose if I’ve learned anything it’s that,while you cannot plan for the unpredictable,it may well happen and it can happen to any of us. For all of the adventures of the last year,I also have much to be thankful for. I have my health and the health of my family and kids. My kids are doing well in starting their lives as young adults. I have a relationship that makes me happy and hopeful for the future. The fundamentals (if we were talking about the economy as described by multiple elected officials) are sound. After a year like the last one,that’s a lot to be thankful for. I was driving through a small town in Washington today when I spotted a billboard with a quote on it. I looked at it for all of the three seconds it took to drive by it,but the quote on it caused it to stick in my head. It said (something very close to):“Tolerance is the last virtue of a dying society”. It was in quotes,so I know it was intended as a quote. But there was no attribution. As I moved along the road,I played it over a few times in my head trying to figure out what the message was trying to say. Was it really trying to imply that tolerance is a bad thing? That seemed unlikely. Who argues that tolerance is bad? Okay,I was able to come up with a few:zealots,xenophobes and small minded bigots. But this was on a billboard owned by a business. Typically I expect a business owner interested in retaining customers to not advertise their bigotry and small mindedness. Was it trying to say that we’re a dying society because we’re tolerant? I’m not sure I’d agree that as a society we are particularly tolerant. It seems like when faced with repeated opportunities to be tolerant our default reaction as a society seems to be to defend the current state of society. See the Defense of Marriage Act as an example where we legislate the status quo to try and defend something that’s not being attacked. I think tolerance is something we strive to practice but as a society it’s a virtue that I think we’re too quick to set aside when we’re frightened by “the other”. Beyond that,though,I was struck wondering who said such a thing? Perhaps it lacked context. Maybe if I knew who said it and why,I might find more merit in a statement that,on the face of it,seemed patently unacceptable. So I made a note to myself to check the quote when I got home. When I got home I googled the phrase and came quickly came up with roughly 5000 attributions for a similar statement to Aristotle:“Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society”. But,that’s not enough. I wanted to understand the context in which that statement was made. I kept thinking something must justify such a wrong headed statement. Interestingly,a bit more research made it clear that I was not the only one who had spotted this or variations on this quote. What was more interesting was that others had similarly researched the quotation and the consensus is that this statement was never made by Aristotle. It was made up to justify ridiculous statements and positions,typically by right wing web sites. As if wrapping it in quotes and attributing it to Aristotle somehow took the bad taste out of what was a pretty offensive statement. By the way,here was one site that addressed the quote: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090516003631AAcNoXS Lesson for the day:Question when someone says something as a “fact”or attributes it to someone to whom we might otherwise give intellectual credibility. And,finally,remember that even if Aristotle had said something so egregiously offensive,that doesn’t make it any less a stupid statement. Let’s talk about interviews. Or,for the purpose of this story,two interviews and what we can learn from them. Interview 1:Red Flags and YouThe first interview was for a job somewhat outside my area of expertise,but I saw it as a subset of what I do as an Engineering Manager. The job was for a Project Manager. Unfortunately,this phrase gets used to cover many kinds of jobs. In some cases PMs are the folks who help wrangle the data that indicates the progress of a project and it’s their job to look for when a project goes sideways,call attention to that fact and get the necessary people in a room to address the problem. Often/usually they don’t have resources they manage directly,so they work with the managers who do control the resources. In this case I was told that PMs did,in fact,manage resources but reported directly to the Director of the group. So,although this sounded different than other PM jobs out there,it sounded close enough to an Engineering Manager position that it seemed something at least worth talking about. After an initial phone screen I was asked to come in and meet with the interview team. The first pair of people I was to talk to were the Director and another PM. The Director and I talked about general experience,management philosophy,how he ran his department. Through all this the other PM was silent. At the end of that interview,which was very short,maybe 40 minutes,the Director asked the other PM if there were any other questions and the answer was no. Two red flags went up from this first interview: - No interaction or questions with the other PM
- Very short interview with me asking more questions than the two interviewers.
The second interview was with a senior architect. That interview opened with the senior architect stating:“I really don’t know what to ask someone interviewing for this position”. And then he just sort of looked at me quietly. Well,crap. That’s not going to work. So,I launched in to a discussion about the kinds of questions he should consider asking of a PM that he might be working with. I gave him the questions,I gave him the answers. I ran the interview and controlled it from start to finish. At one point he said “You know,if I didn’t know better,I’d say you were in Sales!” I don’t think he meant it badly,but what was the alternative? In the absence of any real questions or discussion,I was not going to sit there for 10 minutes and shoot the breeze. So,I took over the interview and made sure that I had a chance to talk about what I could do,my skills,my value to the process,how I run an organization. We discussed some technical tidbits,but not a lot since it had been made clear to me that the Developers develop and the PMs manage the projects and the tasks. Red Flag #3:If you have to run the interview as the interviewee,be worried. What this tells you is one and possibly two things. First,it tells you that the people interviewing really haven’t prepped and/or thought much about interviewing someone who might come on the team. Second,given that I’d been told that they’d already interviewed several people and had more to interview,it likely implied that they were not using a consistent team of interviewers. I’ve found that very useful to have a core group of interviewers to speak with candidates. Yes,it’s a commitment,but without it you’re comparing apples and oranges in terms of feedback when you’re hearing Joe talk about his impression of Candidate #1 and Sam talks about his impressions of Candidate #2. Limit the variables,limit the interview team. Another thing which works well is to establish areas to interview within. Perhaps one team member does team fit and another does technical fit and another quizzes on projects past. You should have the same folks talking to candidates about the same things. Importantly,this eliminates overlaps which are wasteful of time and resources,but it also makes sure that someone has the responsibility to speak to them about the areas that are important to you to place the right person in a given job. Finally,I was supposed to talk to the VP of the group. But he was out and would I be willing to come back another time to speak with him. Sure,things come up,and yes,I am looking for a job,but ideally try and work hard to be respectful of your interviewees time. In the end,I came back and met with the VP. The meeting went fine until the discussion of compensation came up. I was asked what my last salary wasand I was up front but made sure to let him know that it was important to me to look at the total compensation package and that I was looking for an opportunity to work in a different domain than I had in the past. The VP replied that their budget was more in the range of about 70% of what I made in my last job. Well,crap. So,depending on your count,that’s somewhere between three and five red flags from that interview. In a perfect world one might take those and say “Hmmm,my gut is telling me that there’s something not great going on here. Perhaps this isn’t the place for me.” And that’s fantastic if you have the luxury to trust your gut and walk away from a job offer. But,as was pointed out to me,even 70% of my last job is significantly more than I was making on unemployment. And I could always continue to look for a better fit. In the end,it became clear that that job was not a good fit and there was a parting of the ways. So,gut was right,but I did work for several months,which is good. But,on the negative side,there was a parting of the ways,which has not happened to me in 20 years as a professional. That whole experience reminds me of a story one of my mentors told me about when he interviewed for a position at a company where he and I worked together. After meeting with the interview team,he was offered the job. But,before he would take it,he asked to talk with additional people about the job and the company. He really saw the interview process as a two way street. Not only was the company interviewing him for fit,but he took seriously the idea that he was interviewing the company to see if it was someplace he wanted to be. I really respected that approach. I also didn’t feel like I had that opportunity in this case. I needed a job and that puts the balance of power on the side of the company in a way which makes it hard to be objective. Interview 2:Finding My TribeThe second interview started with me waiting in the lobby of the company. One of the managers chatted with me while one of the other managers was trying to clear a conference room for us to talk. As I was chatting with the first manager,the folks in the conference room began to exit. Engineers wearing jeans and t-shirts and the last guy out …had bare feet and a ponytalk. Ah,my people! That first interview portion was with all three of the current managers for that company. Everyone talked,everyone asked questions,everyone participated. I got smiles and handshakes all around and they seemed genuinely interested in talking with me. What was supposed to be 45 minutes turned in to an hour before they decided to hand me over to the VP and HR. Again,smiles and handshakes. Next I spoke with the VP and HR. A bit more on management philosophy,what works and doesn’t work in engineering organizations. I got an overview of the company,how they run things,where their business comes from and a general sense of the values of the company. HR talked about all the usual HR subjects and was very helpful,very nice and a pleasure to talk with. Again,roughly 45 minutes turned in to an hour and we parted with handshakes and smiles all around. Finally I spoke with the owner of the company. So,for this interview for this job I spoke with the entire management team,HR and the owners. That’s an example of folks who are interested and involved with who they are bringing in to the company. We talked some more about the opportunity,what the position would entail,opportunities for growth,necessity to be technical. All the things I would want to be clear on before I consider whether this is someplace I’d like to work. But here are the kinds of details that jumped out at me from this discussion,in addition to all the meat and potatoes subjects:The owner has a bookshelf behind him. In the book shelf were two kinds of books:Technical and Science Fiction. Not management philosophy,not How to Build and Sell a Business or How to Get Rich. Technical and Science Fiction. And Good Science Fiction (which means Science Fiction that I like). So,let’s walk through the second interview: - Great location in downtown Portland
- Interesting technical work and the managers (me!) have to be technical
- Pure engineering organization
- Minimal management structure
- Growing in the midst of a really atrocious economy
- Company values were talked about the talk is walked
- Bare feet and Science Fiction
Now,had both of these interviews happened at a time where they overlapped,it would have been a no-brainer which was the right fit for me. Unfortunately that wasn’t the case,but this second one was certainly worth waiting for. For the first time in probably a decade,I’m excited and looking forward to starting a job. Excited about the challenges and the opportunities. Excited about the people I’ll be working with. I think I found my tribe. I won’t go in to detail here because of the public nature of the Internet,but after two and a half months of employment,I find myself in search of a new job. I learned first hand many things that contribute to a successful organization and what doesn’t,so it’s not a total loss. Best of luck to the place I was as I move on to the place I will be in next! It’s good to learn new things. It keeps us fresh,keeps us from getting complacent. One thing that is true of moving not only to a new job,but a new job in an entirely new domain,is that there will be plenty of new things to learn. Today’s observation relates to vocabulary. It’s probably true that every group larger than four starts to create a unique vocabulary. It’s certainly true when you move from one company to another and even more so if you move to a new industry. With my new job,I get to learn a new industry as well as a new host of TLAs (Three Letter Acronyms) and vocabulary. I’ve read entire emails where while I recognize each and every individual word,I have no bloody idea what the author is talking about. That’s scary! And then,if you like words,occasionally you simply get to learn a new word and its usage. My favorite new word for the week is:Idempotent. I’ve seen it used three times in the last two weeks and,to the best of my knowledge,have never seen the word before that. I had to look it up on Wikipedia. No,I’m not going to explain it here because they do a better job of explaining it there. Turns out it has an application in software as well which I’d never been exposed to before and was not clear from the context. New things to learn! Life is good! Now to use it in a sentence… “If I have a sex change operation and then have another one,I’ll be back where I started,”he observed idempotently. Hmmm. See,that’s funnier after you read the Wikipedia article. But not much. As I get older I’m being forced to acknowledge that my physical body is not accepting my mental premise that I’m pretty much the same as I was when I was 18 years old. I’m forced to rationalize more things to myself. I tell myself I’m wiser though strangely slower to learn some new things. I have a slower metabolism while at the same time recalling the days I could eat anything and everything that passed within reach of my hands and mouth and suffer no ill consequences aside from occasional indigestion. I still have hair that hasn’t gone gray (yet),but either my forehead is getting taller or (*gasp*) my hairline might be receding. I can still play a good game of volleyball and jump pretty well,but I seem to walk a bit funny the next day and getting out of bed my ankles or perhaps my knees seem oddly pained. Oh,and I have full-grown kids,near adults where before that I used to have children then infants then …well,more intent then opportunity to explore the joys of the opposite sex. All this has caused me to start to wrap my head around the fact that,to use a golf metaphor,which probably firmly places me with my elders,statistically I seem to be on the back nine of my life. More life behind me than I likely have ahead of me. The time I have ahead of me will probably be marked more by the passing of my ability to do things I’ve taken for granted like playing volleyball without pain,jumping high without warming up,learning quickly,staying up till 2am programming something interesting,eating spicy foods and not suffering the punishments of my digestive tract. Instead,I’m learning of the joys of Tums,ibuprofen and the reality that creating muscle mass becomes more difficult on the back nine of this course. What else? Oh,yeah. I seem to forget things more easily. Names,things that I remembered five minutes before,what brought me in to the room I’m standing in while I try to reconstruct the last five minutes of thoughts to see what drew me here. At the same time,I’m certainly thankful for where I am now. I’m healthy,happy and have purpose. I am loved and I love. So,all in all,not a bad deal. This thought process also had me thinking about immortality. Not the living forever part,though if I could choose to do that as my 25 year old self and still know what I know that might have some appeal. But,that’s really nothing more than a fun way to wile away a bit of time,like thinking about what you’d do if you won that $200M powerball lottery. Failing science coming in the next 40 years and figuring out how to clone my body and create a 25-year old version of me that I can download in to,I’m left thinking about other demonstrable notions of immortality. Before I go on,I want to make clear that I’m not even going to touch the spiritual part of this discussion. That’s not something I can prove or disprove. It’s a matter of faith and that’s a different discussion. For the purposes of this discussion,let’s define terms. The dictionary defines immortality thusly:“the quality or state of being immortal:a: unending existence b: lasting fame”. I’m going to define it a bit differently and talk about immortality in the sense of what we leave behind after we are gone from this world. Even if it’s not forever,immortality is what persists after we are gone. With that in mind,I think there are three demonstrable forms of immortality that are worth thinking about. They are:our children,the things we make and our acts. Our Children Our children are our most direct “product”in terms of literally leaving something of ourselves to persist and continue in the world. But,the same applies for adopted children since the impact a parent has on the child in terms of day-to-day interactions is at least as critical as the genetic component. It’s not Nature versus Nurture. It’s Nature plus Nurture. We don’t get to pick which of our natural traits we get to pass on to our children,so there’s certainly a somewhat random melange there. They will likely receive both the worst and the best of us. One of our main added values is in trying to help our children do better with what we’ve given them than we may have done ourselves. Our children will grow up and become independent individuals that carry the legacy of our genetics as well as the everything we’ve tried to be as people and parents. Hopefully the net result of that is more positive than negative. Scientists can,in some cases,trace the genetic drift of certain chromosomes which allows them to track characteristics back thousands of years to a time and place. That’s certainly a certain kind of immortality. Someone was born with a mutation for red hair (likely multiple someones) and the characteristic persists today. Perhaps some characteristic of my genetic profile will persist hundreds or more years in to the future,albeit mixed with whatever comes in from elsewhere in future generations. So,we see that while our children inherit (some might say suffer) the largest piece of our genetic legacy,that continues,albeit diluted,in to later generations. Similarly,what we teach them about how to be in the world,right and wrong,how to handle disappointment,how to work hard,what’s truly important (to us). These,too,will persist in some form. The difference is that later generations will largely be a random mix of genetic tendencies,but our children will consciously choose what and who to be. Or not to be. We’re not doing genetic engineering of our offspring (yet),but generations have partaken in values engineering or behavioral engineering as we choose what to take from our parents and perpetuate in our own lives. In the end,this form of immortality is one of the most direct ways to influence the world we leave behind. But it’s certainly not the only form. Things We Make There have always been people who created art in various forms,be it painting,poetry,music or any other form that has existed through history. We know who painted the Mona Lisa,we know the Eiffel Tower was named after the guy who created it,most of us can probably quote a least a bit of poetry and hopefully the author,or a bit of Shakespeare or a few bars of a classic piece of music and the composer. This is the most recognized form of immortality in the form of the Things We Make. Will they persist forever? No,but they will certainly last long after the individual is gone. But,you might say,everyone can’t be a DaVinci,Michaelangelo,Shakespeare or Mozart! And,of course,you’d be right. So,what,I would probably reply. Maybe you won’t create the next Eiffel Tower,but that doesn’t stop us from creating something that can live on past our time. I have a couple pieces of wooden furniture and toys created by my step-Grandfather,Pappy. Each has a small brand on the bottom of them that says “Hand crafted by Pappy”. When those pass on to my children or they give it to their children (one of them is a small stool shaped like a turtle with a cushion on the top),my kids will know that this came from Pappy. They may not have known him (he passed away before they were very old),but I will get the chance to tell them the story of how the stool came to be and how much Pappy loved making things for people. This is a form of immortality. He will live on in the things he made. Are they the Eiffel Tower? No,but watching my son sit on the turtle stool while learning to tie his shoes is a memory that is far more real to me and touches me deeper than when I stood in front of the Eiffel Tower. Is it impressive? Sure. But it lacks an emotional component that that little stool will always have. And that emotional connection will hopefully grow as my son passes that little stool down to his kids and they make their own stories and create their own connections to that piece of wood and stuffing. Thanks for that,Pappy. There’s been a movement afoot that I’ve noticed in last few years. People are Making more things. Average people. They’re learning skills in wood working,crafting,electronics. They’re taking things that other have built and twisting them in to new and amazing things. You can read about this in great blogs like Make (http://blog.makezine.com). Frankly anything that helps turn people from Consumers to Producers is a good thing for our world. And I’m not talking about producing more cars or *stuff*. I’m talking about the fact that a proportionally very small number of people Produce the material that the rest of the developed world Consumes. I’m talking about art,music,books,media in all its forms,games,etc. Think how many people passively absorb the results of the hard work of a relatively small number of producers. Millions see a movie that hundreds (perhaps thousands) of people made. Millions read a book that was written by a single person. The proportion of Consumers to Producers for media and art is skewed very heavily towards a reducing number of Producers and a growing number of Consumers. Thousands of people lament how long it takes a popular author to write the next book in a beloved series. Millions consume that series. One person created it. If our society persists in creating a system that reduces the number of Producers down to a one to a million kind of ratio,it will become unsustainable. Or,rather,it will be the death of a variety of voices as the only choices available via mass media marketing are those where millions of Consumers pay for the output. Makers are turning that around. They produce things. They Make things and music and art and words! Certainly the Internet has helped facilitate that. It allows people to communicate from one-to-one or one-to-many. Bloggers can have audiences of a few family and friends or have thousands of people reading their material. One person can create a plan for something as simple as an Adirondack chair and share that on the Internet so that instead of just his chair,there are hundreds of chairs out there. And each person is welcome to tweak the design to suit their need when people open that design up to others. That’s an immortality,too. Personally,I’m a dilettante with intentions to improve in the Making space. I write sometimes,though I’ve published nothing,yet. I’ve written computer software that was published in a book. I’ve created animations and I’ve had images I created on the computer featured in books. Not bad,but I can do better. I believe we can all Make more than we do. Paint. Write. Draw. Learn the guitar. Create a game. Maybe it is only seen locally or only by family,but the act of creation is an amazing thing. That energy gets transformed in to something that will persist. Maybe it persists in itself or maybe it influences someone or encourages them to make something themselves. That act of creation can have far more impact than the work that went in to it. That’s immortality! Our Acts The final area where we have an ability to have an impact even after we are gone is in our acts. This last is certainly more amorphous,less prone to easy measurement. By our act,I mean the ways we touch,both intentionally and unintentionally,those around us in the world. These can be as small as opening a door for someone or smiling at someone and asking them abou their day. And listening to the response like you care! They can also be large. An endowment or scholarship fund. Think what you will of Bill Gates,but his Gates Foundation is likely to have a profound impact long after he is actively involved and likely long after he has left this world. But,there’s much ground in the middle,too. Think about someone who volunteers at a soup kitchen,or cleans up garbage in a community. What about a Big Brother,Big Sister or a Foster parent. These people have an effect from the very local,even to a single person,up to something as large as our local community. And those changes,those ripples that we introduce in the pond around us,can have profound impacts long after the act that caused that ripple. You might recall the 2000 movie “Pay It Forward”where the main character had the idea of doing a good deed and asking the recipient rather than paying them back,to pay it forward to someone else in need. The ripples continue after the initial stone is dropped. Finally In the end,we all pass on and leave a legacy of some form. Few people manage to leave this earth without having affected someone in big and small ways,or made something that is left behind,or without having loved and been loved. That’s a real sense of immortality. It’s tangible. We can wrap our heads and our hearts around it. And,at the same time,it gives us something to strive for. It gives us a checkpoint that we can take to look at ourselves and ask questions about how we are living our lives,who we are touching,what are we making,what are we doing that makes some difference? That kind of self-analysis,that mental and emotional check-in is an important opportunity to make sure that our life doesn’t just slip away from us between all the moments and days where we just do the next thing without thought,without reflection,without direction. Time is an arrow and it can’t be stopped. Like Ferris Bueller said:“Life moves pretty fast. If you don’t stop and look around once in a while,you could miss it.” Don’t miss yours. | |